The defensive midfielder is a position that
could be considered a fairly modern development, coming to fore in the 70's and
80's. Herbert Chapman's innovative 2-3-5 ensured that defensive midfielders
weren't required for quite some time. Sir Alf Ramsey's wingless wonders of the
4-4-2, which won the 1966 World Cup, utilised a midfield duo that could shuttle
up and down for the whole game, more of all action, box to box players.
This specialisation evolved from a position
called the 'sweeper'. The sweeper was a player hence named because he would
sweep up after his back line. It was originally a defensive innovation,
inspired by the Catenaccio system of Italy.
The points system in Serie A then was 1-for
a draw and 2-for a win, and so many managers considered not losing almost
equivalent to winning and they came up with a versatile centre back who could
be the last resort if the back line were breached. The system was however
preached majorly for a three man defence as this would enable the two centre
backs to mark the opposing forwards and leave one defender free to clean up
after.
Alf Ramsey's 4-4-2 or 'Wingless Wonders' |
Herbert Chapman's 2-3-5 |
The most elegant example of a Sweeper is probably one of the most elegant players to have ever kicked a ball, Der Kaiser-Franz Beckenbauer. As time went on, managers understood that the sweeper/libero was a free player as he did not have to mark anybody and thus was nearly always in a free position. Therefore, players who were good with the ball were deployed in such a role so that they could use the plenty of time they got on the ball to pick out a pass and be a playmaker. Beckenbauer was the prime example of this type of player with incredible positional sensibilities, knowing when to attack and when to defend. His performances in the 1970 World Cup are the stuff of legend and he is without a doubt the greatest player to have played the role.
However the Brazilian system of attacking
full backs(Djalma Santos and Carlos Alberto) was far more impactful considering
Brazil's victories in the 1970 World Cup and more and more teams opened up to
the idea of a back four and attacking full backs.
Der Kaiser |
The 90's and the first decade of the new millennium saw the tough tackling midfielder come to prominence. This was the man who did all the dirty work in front of his defence, breaking up opposition attacks, coming in with tackles when necessary and passing the ball to his fellow midfielders to allow them to dictate play. An example could be Lothar Matthaus, Germany's most capped player who played in five WC's and was described by Maradona as his toughest opponent. We'll take a look at him in one of our "Legends Of the Game" articles. Another modern example of this is a certain Claude Makelele who most PL fans of our generation would be familiar with. Giving the man the respect he deserves we'll discuss this midfielder under his name:
The Makelele Role:
Claude Makelele |
The short Frenchman was hardly the 'hard man' (Roy Keane style) ,defensive midfielders in those days was expected to be. He was unlucky enough to be at Real Madrid during the Galacticos days and was booted out when he demanded pay parity from Fiorentino Perez. His role at Real was oft overlooked, he broke up attacks and gave the ball to players such as Zidane who could neglect all their defensive responsibilities because of the defensive presence of Makelele.
Jose Mourinho took him to Chelsea where he
was treated better and played his part in Chelsea's league triumph. His effect
was very visible in the PL simply because most teams still used a 4-4-2 leaving
only two in midfield against the three in Mourinho's 4-3-3.His job consisted of
incredible positional discipline in covering his back four, covering for them
when they bombed forward and putting in crucial challenges.
The Makelele role remains the only position
named after a footballer.
The Death of the ‘Hard man’:
Roy Keane(with Viera,of course) |
Every transfer window, Sir Alex Ferguson is asked the same question. Will we buy another Roy Keane ? Why does he not do it? Surely a man who could afford to buy the world’s most expensive defender and a 29 year old striker for 24 mil could have bought one if he’d wanted to. The answer is simple enough, Ferguson recognises the distance between other powerful European clubs and his is the difference in midfield. Barcelona have Busquets, Real have Alonso and Khedira (still, no Roy Keane), Bayern have Schweinsteiger and now Javi Martinez, all of them decent tacklers but none of them are there just for their physicality. A hard tackling player is replaced with somebody who can hold possession better and has the skill to manoeuvre out of tight situations without making stupid errors. Possession based football is the way forward and Ferguson knows it which explains his persistence with Michael Carrick.
The return of the Regista/ Libero/ Sweeper:
The greatest regista ever-Andrea Pirlo |
AC Milan reached three CL finals in 5 years
from 2003 to 2007 under Carlo Ancelotti.Milan played very narrow alternating
between a 4-3-2-1/4-3-1-2. It is worth noting that this was a midfield that had No
10's all over the place from Seedorf to Kaka to Andrea Pirlo and Rui Costa. The
only combative players were Ambrosini and Rino Gattuso. There was no place for
Pirlo in the hole behind the striker and thus he was posted in front of his
defense as a creative player who put in defensive duties when he had to, ably
backed by Gattuso.
This position is what we call a 'regista'
or a deep lying playmaker. The rise of these players could be attributed to the
decline in the number of clubs employing No10’s. This decline came about simply
because a No10 is supposed to do it all and when inconsistent, the whole team
can suffer.
Ironically, two recent examples could be
British in Owen Hargreaves and Jack Rodwell (who are both quicker than Pirlo and
can tackle better but may not possess the same range of passing). Manchester
City’s poor European run would have irked Mancini as this was the same problem
he face at Inter. This is probably why he bought both Hargreaves and Rodwell, in
the hope of finding a regista who could dictate play from deep.
Digressing, we see that today most teams
play with a single striker and two centre backs. Thus, one centre back can mark
the opposing striker leaving the other centre half free to attack, almost like
an offensive sweeper. Modern football is full of such examples ranging from
Gerard Pique to Thomas Vermaelen. These are the modern interpretations of the
sweeper reinvented as they were before in the times of Der Kaiser
Conclusion:
So, which is better ? Would you prefer a Roy
Keane like figure in front of your defense or a Xabi Alonso/ Pirlo type player ?
Defensive Mids covering for full backs in a 4-2-3-1 |
Modern managers have answered this conundrum by deploying one of each. Today's most common formation is arguably the 4-2-3-1 where the 2 represents the holders/defensive midfielders. Even in different formations, there are generally two dedicated holding players. The 4-3-3 is almost the only exception to this trend. Notable examples of the holding midfield duo are Alonso/ Khedira (for Real) and Daniele De Rossi/ Pirlo (for Italy).
The defensive midfielder, though the most
non glamorous position is frankly the glue holding together most modern great
attacking teams. The incredible level of discipline and ability on the ball
required are something that very few players possess. It is the Rooneys,Van
Persies, Gerrards, Lampards, Ronaldos who take away all the attention but they
wouldn't have had the freedom to do as they pleased if they hadn't had
Carrick, Mascherano, Lucas Leiva, Makelele, Khedira and Alonso behind them
So, the next time you watch a football
match, take a minute and observe these unheralded players who get their hands
dirty for hardly any praise and adulation and applaud them silently.
Any questions and comments, please do post
them below or on Facebook. Thanks for reading..
Great article!
ReplyDeleteThe CDMs are often regarded as the bad guys because of the cards they tend to pick up tackling. Certainly deserve more appreciation.
Yes..they are the ones who 'take one for the team' when needed to..
ReplyDelete